Orthogecko

Platform

Multimodal AI Analytics for Musculoskeletal Health

Upload imaging and motion data to turn complex orthopedic measurements into clear, actionable insights.

Upload Images and Wearable Data →

Evidence-driven. Patient-focused.

Objective metrics to support better decisions and better outcomes.

Full-body anatomical model standing front-on, with the lumbar spine, hip and knee marked
Lumbar spine Hip Knee
Three regions studied →

Multimodal Fusion

Example case · illustrative values

Imaging

What the imaging shows

Lumbar Spine

Lateral lumbar radiograph as segmented in the app: vertebrae L1 to L5, disc spaces and the sacrum outlined, with endplate lines Cobb L1–L5 29.1° Lordosis

Lumbar X-ray

Lateral View View Analysis →

Imaging

Lumbar X-ray Analysis

A lateral lumbar film is segmented into vertebrae, discs and the sacrum, and each parameter is measured from the endplates and walls of those outlines. Point at any value and the film shows where it was measured.

Whole lumbar spine
Lordosis L1–L5 and L1–S1 (Cobb), sacral slope, sacral table angle, lordosis distribution index
Per level
Segmental angle and disc height index, L1–L2 to L4–L5; slip down to L5–S1
Per vertebra
Wedge ratio, L1 to L5

Layers switch on and off: vertebrae, discs, sacrum and endplate lines. Measured automatically from the segmentation and not validated against manual measurement.

Spine X-ray result, as shown in the app

Motion

Gait & Biomechanics Overview

Side view of a person mid-stride, with the pose-estimation skeleton traced over hips, knees, ankles and feet
Pose estimation from gait video
Trunk Inclination ↓
2.73 deg

Forward trunk lean

Cadence ↑
115.6 spm

Steps per minute

Step-Time Symmetry ↑
0.10 —

Left / Right step-time difference

Stance Phase ↑
62.9 %

Portion of gait cycle

Knee Flexion (max) ↓
68.6 deg

Peak knee flexion

Walking Speed ↑
1.42 m/s

Meters per second

↑ ↓ indicate direction of change only — no magnitude is implied.

View Full Report →

Report

Inside the Report

Every number in the report explains what it measures, the published evidence behind it, and where the measurement stops being reliable.

Gait report in the Orthogecko app: posture-angle metrics for one walk, with an open explanation of hip extension listing what it measures, published evidence and its limits
Gait analysis, as shown in the app · 1 / 2

Motion

Sit-to-Stand Test

The five-times sit-to-stand test from a single side-view phone video. Pose estimation finds each repetition in the rise of the pelvis, times rising and sitting down, and measures trunk lean and knee and hip angles on the side facing the camera.

Five-Repetition Time
13.23 s

Five stand-ups, arms crossed

Rising (mean)
0.46 s

Seated to standing

Sitting Down (mean)
0.50 s

Standing to seated

Repetition Variability
0.022 —

Spread of repetition times

Trunk Lean (peak)
29.2 deg

Forward lean while rising

Knee Flexion (seated)
98.6 deg

Side facing the camera

Results from the recording shown. Side view, one person on a chair without armrests, arms crossed on the chest. Thresholds are derived, not validated against a reference device.

Pose estimation from a sit-to-stand video

Structure meets function

Lateral lumbar radiograph as segmented in the app: vertebrae L1 to L5, disc spaces and the sacrum outlined, with endplate lines: the structural evidence
Structure — 29.1°
Person mid-stride with the pose-estimation skeleton traced over the legs: the functional evidence
Function — 1.42 m/s

Read against one another, the radiograph and the gait trace answer different questions. How closely their answers agree — the concordance between structure and function — is what the recovery score measures.

Recovery score

Example case · illustrative values

Structure and function, read as one recovery.

82
/ 100 Good

The Orthogecko Recovery Score fuses structural phenotype, gait and wearable trajectory into one figure — then states, in plain language, what each input contributed.

Readiness is high — recovery expected in six to eight weeks.

Trajectory is positive, at 67% probability of the target outcome.

Structure and function agree — low discordance between radiograph and gait.

Risk of delay is moderate if the patient stays inactive beyond seven days.

Mobility reserve sits above the population baseline.

Confidence is high — data quality and model agreement both hold.

Fused from X-ray findings + gait video + wearable data Updated today · Next update in 7 days

Upload imaging and motion data to turn complex orthopedic measurements into clear, actionable insights.

Upload Images and Wearable Data →